Reply To: Myth Becomes History

[Kaylyn Kelly]

RE: Miranda
Your post was very well thought out and I agreed with all of the information you explained. In your post, you stated, “Instead of finding evidence that leads to the conclusion of the mask representing the king, he came to the conclusion first that it’s Agamemnon and then fit the evidence to the theory”. Do you think that Schliemann could have done this for publicity and also altered “The Mask of Agamemnon” for that reason? Maybe he purposefully looked over the information and altered the mask for this reason.